For many borrowers, the choice of whether to file bankruptcy depends on a determination of whether a home-owner will be liable for debt on his home following foreclosure.
California has enacted a very strong law protecting home-owners from deficiency judgments following a foreclosure. This is called the anti-deficiency statute or non-recourse statute. It says, in sum, that borrowers who take:
1. purchase money loans
2. on an owner-occupied residence
are not liable to the lender for deficiencies following a non-judicial foreclosure. There is a lot to unpack in that statement. Let us look deeper into the California anti-deficiency statute piece by piece:
Purchase Money
A loan is purchase money when all of the money taken out by the loan was used to purchase the home. This is generally met in first mortgages. Some second mortgages qualify as purchase money, generally when they were taken at the same time as the first. In some cases, refinances will maintain the purchase money character, but an examination into the terms of the refinanced loan is necessary.
Loans that are never purchase money include home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), refinances where the borrower takes hard money out of the house, debt consolidation loans, home improvement loans, etc.
Owner-Occupied Residence
To be non-recourse the loan in question must be secured by an owner-occupied dwelling of no more than 4 units. That means you have to have lived in the property secured by the loan. The residence requirements are not particularly spelled out, but the requirement is intended to root out the real estate investor.
Non-judicial Foreclosure
There are two types of foreclosure in California: judicial and non-judicial. By far the most common foreclosures are non-judicial. Non-judicial foreclosure are much less expensive, faster, and do not require a judge's approval. The non-recourse statute only protects borrowers from non-judicial foreclosures, but almost all foreclosures in California are non-judicial.
Non-Recourse: What does it mean?
If your loan is non-recourse, it means that upon foreclosure the only thing that the home lender can recover from you is the property itself. The loan will be considered satisfied by the foreclosure sale, regardless of the price that the home fetches. The lender cannot sue you for the deficiency (the amount that you are upside down on the house) or take other collection actions against you.
The non-recourse statute does not necessarily protect you from intentional damage that you do to the home, however, as other causes of action may arrive from trashing the house or stripping the copper piping. So avoid damaging the house on your way out.
Deficiency
Finally, it is important to remember the difference between being liable for a deficiency on a loan is different that incurring cash liability. This article deals with debt liability--whether the lender can sue the borrower for cash after the foreclosure--as opposed to tax liability. In almost all foreclosures the lender will send the borrower a 1099 after the trustee's sale or short sale. There are many defenses to the 1099 including insolvency, various state and federal homeowner's tax relief acts, and capital gains tax laws. These defenses are not explored in detail in this article.
Deficiency would result in collection action and potentially a law suit and judgment resulting in wage garnishment, liens on future property, or levies of bank accounts.
You are here
Non-Recourse Loans: The California Anti-Deficiency Statute and Foreclosure
Submitted by Carl Gustafson on Thu, 05/13/2010 - 2:33pm
Eliminate Your Debt NOW!
800-404-0018
Comments
collection agency
In 2011, a home we purchased in 2005 was foreclosed. We first asked for help in Dec 2008. In Feb 2009, they told us they would only talk to us about assistance if we were 90+ days late. We stopped making payments on both. We had a 1st and 2nd (Equity line), both through Chase and both were purchase money only. We never touched the equity/2nd for anything else. It was a non-judicial foreclosure. When I call Chase, they tell me the 2nd was written off in April 2009. I had a loan specialist and a real estate atty both tell me, over the phone, that our 2nd was non-recourse and Ca was non deficiency and both loans would go with the foreclosure. Now a collection agency, almost a year after the foreclosure, is telling me my loan is NOT a non-recourse because we weren't "grandfathered" into the law and that we still owe on the 2nd. What is this business about being grandfathered into the law?
Foreclosure
I foreclosed my California house in 2011. The lender agreed in paper do wave any deficiency judment against me. Is this good enough to protect me, the home was an all cash purchase never refinanced. Also is there a statue of limitation for such judgements?
Pros & Cons
That is exactly why banks sometimes require co-signers. If the primary person can not pay they go after the co-signer. So declaring bankruptcy will not keep them from going after the co-signer for money.If you have it repossessed that will also go on the Co-Signers credit so you really need to talk this over with them. I am not sure but I believe that if you have a co-signer it can not be placed under bankruptcy protection. For this you really should ask an attorney.
Bank not forclosing.
I was in the middle of some home improvements (which weren't completed) when I decided to stop putting money into a house that was worth less than half of what I paid. I lived in the house with my family. It was the first house I ever bought. We moved out when I stopped making payments, thinking the bank would forclose promptly (ethically). I stopped making payments in January this year. In July the bank assigned a collection agency to try to get me to short sale with one of the conditions being that I put up the money to maintain the property, I have none, so I told them I was willing to do a deed in lieu. I received no response to that. I have not received a notice of default, and today received notice from a collection agency in Texas stating I owe the bank the full loan amount. Is it possible to hire a lawyer with no money? I was laid off from my job about three months ago and my job outlook is bleak.
Purchase Money HELOC
Does Utah have similar laws protecting borrowers who took out 80/20 loans and never refi'd or used the HELOC for anything but the initial purchase?